Вот тут достаточно информации чтобы спроектировать турбину Тесла включая эксель табличку
http://www.stanford.edu/~hydrobay/lookat/tt.html
и вовремя передумать её делать
http://teslatech.com.ua/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5&Itemid=5 - опыты украинца
Вопрос в форуме
I'm trying to figure out why Tesla's turbine and compressors aren't commercially produced. I don't buy the conspiracy theory. Are they just not efficient? It sure seems like they would be cheaper to produce. On the surface the idea sounds great but 80 years have gone by and if they were good they would have been a commercial success by now.
Ответ
The answer is simple but not satisfactory to the people who find conspiracies even in their soup: Tesla turbines haven't lived up to their promise.
These's more to a pump or a turbine than mere function or opeability. To be commerically salable it has to produce flow or power efficiently at a specified rate and that rate has to be tailorable to suit the customer's requirements.
There are pump and turbine manufacturers who would sell their first born sons to get an edge on their competitors. The Tesla pumps and turbines are well known and they're described in most college physics text. If the Tesla designs had shown the least promise you can be sure a model would be in production within weeks of a successful application to a commercial need.
The failure of the Tesla pump and turbine designs to make it to market ain't a conspiracy. It ain't keeping a good design down. It's not even lack of availability. It's a case of too many other designs having superior performance characteristics that offer more bang for buck.
